UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1206 readers

1 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.

New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide

Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.

Community Spotlight

Useful Links

Community Rules

Follow the Code of Conduct.
Posts must be on-topic.
No duplicate posts.
No commercial activity.
No memes.
Titles must accurately represent the content of the submission.
Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post).
Common Question posts must include a link to the previous question thread if previously asked.
Low effort, toxic comments regarding public figures may be removed.
Off-topic political discussion may be removed at moderator discretion.

Other Communities

!uapmemes@lemmy.world

If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

SignullGone@lemmy.world

HM05_Me@lemmy.world

Seth Shostak, the senior astronomer for the SETI Institute, shares his thoughts. (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by SignullGone@lemmy.world to c/uap@lemmy.world

54 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I personally believe there might be many "great filters" and we are simply at the filter between terrestrial and local space life. I feel like there would be another great filter between local space and interstellar space. There could even be another filter to access higher dimensions. This is purely speculation, but it's something I enjoy pondering.

Unless there really is a whole field of physics that we haven’t touched yet. If that’s the case, all bets are off.

I'm not a physicist, but it seems like we have the basic building blocks. It's clear we're missing a significant piece of the puzzle given that we're still unable to reconcile the physics of the very large (general relativity) with the physics of the very small (quantum mechanics). If I were a betting man, I'd place my chips on the notion that we only understand a small fraction of the nature of our reality and the rules that govern it.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Each time we pass a filter, we have to invent a new filter to explain the Fermi Paradox.

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Filterception