Privacy

32003 readers

1055 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

109

I feel like anti encryption bills will only ban it from the main stream and be used to punish people who don't let the police see their devices (pricefield.org)

submitted 1 year ago by skymtf@pricefield.org to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I feel like anti encryption bills do nothing but allow the mainstream public go get their DMS used for ads, and punish people who don't give all their data to cops upon arrest. I feel like people like me would just use foreign matrix instances where encryption is legal

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I've been wondering if one of their ulterior motives is to kill work from home situations. Commercial real estate landlords are losing $850 billion a year because of remote work prevalence, and we know how much the government bends the knee for wealthy business owners. Without encrypted VPNs, no company is going to allow remote work.

[–] JhonnyTheJeccer@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But it also prevents encrypted emails, making confidential communication between companies impossible. I do not think that companies would be able to operate with their trade secrets just out in the open.

[–] RQG@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

The recent EU law drafts I've seen so far have exceptions for businesses, government employees and basically everyone except the normal private person.

I guess in many countries founding something like an LLC is pretty damn cheap so I guess we'll all be businesses soon.

[–] skymtf@pricefield.org 7 points 1 year ago

I wonder, part of doesn't think they can kill https , TLS stuff which is important. They are likely gonna target E2EE, rather than client to server.

[–] GeekyNerdyNerd@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That would be incredibly stupid to do that for the commerical real estate industry alone. The online retail industry alone is equal in size, and that doesn't even take into the dozens of other similarly large industries that would become too risky to exist without TLS and other encryption schemes.

I think it's significantly more likely that the effort is actually genuinely about muh terrorism/muh pedos than I about protecting landlords that are dwarfed by the industries this kinds crap would undermine.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah really it would undermine the very foundation of the modern world. e-commerce, online banking, retail and commercial money transfers, online payment providers, account security, business communication, and a million other things rely on encryption. That's why it is so baffling to me that they're trying to kill it. Unless the plan is something like "let us read your Facebook and WhatsApp messages", in which case it's just creepy and unconstitutional.