this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
168 points (95.2% liked)

Science

13019 readers
14 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Spacebar@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

I wonder if the diet soda studies are related to this?

For instance, diet Coke intake is supposed to correlate with very bad health outcomes.

Edit: downvoted for a question in a Science community? Do better, people.

[–] UnfortunateBlaster69@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Could it be that people who are already predisposed to getting overweight try to avoid it by diet drinks, but fail because it's genetics and they take more calories on average? Correlation=/=Causation?

[–] fear@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

I mostly agree with your point, just substitute "genetics" for the actual array of reasons why we have an obesity epidemic. Environment, upbringing, emotional state, level of education, financial resources, access to healthy food, sedentary lifestyle, disordered eating habits, trauma, medications, hormonal imbalances, physical and mental health, etc.

It's common sense that people trying to lose weight are more likely to reach for non-caloric products, and with other studies showing that most people who lose weight will gain it back within 5-10 years, it's makes this study's results obvious and proves nothing new unfortunately. Sweeteners very well could be an independent cause of weight gain, but until they account for all of the confounding factors that influence why people gain and lose weight, they won't be able to determine its true role in the matter.

load more comments (4 replies)