this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
764 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59197 readers
3207 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] M_Reimer@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (10 children)

The problem is that Google is able to more or less dictate how the web works at that time. Apart from Firefox and Safari, which both only have a minor market share, pretty much everything is Chrome based.

If Google wants to push some silly idea just to ensure that their silly ads are not blocked, then they'll do it. I fear that noone really can stop this stupid idea.

[–] sane@feddit.de 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

We need to hope some governing body steps in and slaps Google with antitrust, because this is a pretty clear abuse of monopoly

[–] 7u5k3n@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm sure our octogenarian leaders who are oh so internet savvy will fully understand the nuances associated with browser market share will craft laws to resolve this issue.

/s unfortunately.

Truth be told.. Google applies $$$ to our aged elected officials who don't understand what a browser is much less the nuances behind chrome and chromium based browsers. And will vote by what their campaign donators say... :(

[–] Mayoman68@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hot take: the narrative that politicians do not understand technology due to their age is giving them too much credit. They have entire offices full of staffers whose entire job is to explain these things to them in ways they understand, as I am sure they have for some of the more important things. They just don't care because their purpose is to serve corporations, not the public.

[–] 7u5k3n@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They just don't care because their purpose is to serve corporations, not the public.

Sadly... This is probably pretty accurate for most of our modern politicians. I'm sure there's the odd official who cares... But they are a vast minority.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)