this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
204 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37727 readers
709 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Employees say they weren’t adequately warned about the brutality of some of the text and images they would be tasked with reviewing, and were offered no or inadequate psychological support. Workers were paid between $1.46 and $3.74 an hour, according to a Sama spokesperson.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 129 points 1 year ago (67 children)

Cool. Using slave labor to train tools to strip the best parts of humanity away from us so that AI can do creative activities like poetry and art while we're more and more stuck in a gig economy.

Cool cool cool cool.

[–] QHC@kbin.social 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (18 children)

so that AI can do creative activities

Let me stop you right there. The current concept of "AI"--otherwise known as Large Language Models because that is really what people are referring to--is not capable of creativity. ChatGPT and things like it just regurgitate stuff they find. They can't create something new and original

[–] tombuben@beehaw.org 20 points 1 year ago (7 children)

It doesn't really matter though. It will take away jobs from people in creative industries that only creative people were able to do before. The end result is basically the same.

[–] QHC@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why would AI that can't be creative take jobs from people that are capable of being creative?

[–] phi1997@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because it's not the AI that's taking away jobs, but the executives hoping to cut costs regardless of creativity, quality, or ethics.

[–] QHC@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So then blame the real problem, which is not new and has always been the main enemy: capitalism and its demand for seeking profits despite any consequences.

That has nothing to do with "AI" and still doesn't have anything to do with the original claim of whether or not the new wave of LLMs are capable of creativity.

[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

I am. That's the thing that I'm blaming. The claim I was making was that OpenAI has engaged in violent colonialism inherent to capitalism with the goal of making Elon rich, and the rest of us poor.

[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Bookmarking isn't the same as boosting, but it's the best I can do. Keep screaming it from the rooftops my dude, dudette, or non binary doodling

[–] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because businesses dont want to pay for labor. They dont care about what quality we get as consumers

[–] lloram239@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

For the same reason that CGI has replaced practical effects: It gives more control to the producers and makes it faster to iterate and change stuff. It doesn't even need to be cheaper or look better for that.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (62 replies)