this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
507 points (97.6% liked)

World News

39096 readers
3454 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] unused_nerons@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I gave an example of a treatment style pharmaceutical that has been used consistently to boost corporate profits rather than serve the greater good. Would you like to talk about the cost of epipens next? How about the opioid industry?

[–] Erk@cdda.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A pill that treats solid tumours would be an enormous boon to humanity. You're letting really tired cynicism get in the way of basic logic. This argument would mean that insulin wasn't a breakthrough, because it didn't cure diabetes.

For profit pharmaceuticals is indeed a huge issue, but it's one that is entirely separate from whether or not a given medical treatment is good or not.

[–] osarusan@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

grumble grumble Look at this big pharma scheme that allows people to live longer! grrrr I'd rather die from cancer than let big pharma take my hard-earned dollars!

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you saying insulin has not served the greater good? This whole "treatments are a conspiracy to enrich corporate profits" BS is crazy. That it can happen, and sometimes does happen, does not mean it always happens or never happens.

The world is complicated. Simplified "pharma bad" arguments are pure fantasy.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Not only that, it's also important to consider just how vast pharmaceuticals as a branch of industry and research and medicine is, overall.

Sure, some exec at the top might be a money-grubbing arsehole who couldn't care any less if 8 billion people died so long as they made 2% more profits.

But there's a giant apparatus of often very serious and very altruistic researchers, doctors, nurses, workers and helpers underneath that, too. Lots of bad apples, lots of shining examples. Just like, well, any other industry.

And sure, one can easily argue "but you're playing with people's lives here, it's not okay for it to be like this". And of course I agree. But it's utopian to think we can fix this with reductive, as you say, "pharma bad"-arguments. And it's not like the transport industry, the power industry, the the military-industrial complex (intentionally) or the tourism industry don't habiutally play with people's lives. We just tend to not notice it as directly.

And sure, I get that for americans in particular this is a sore topic of particular import because they're so vulnerable to exploitation due to a lack of social support structure and regulated and standardized insurances.

But anything can be reduced to a simple "is bad" if we want it to. It's important to not think in such simplistic us-vs-them terms, otherwise nothing can ever be improved.