Fediverse

19 readers

2 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the federated social networking ecosystem, which includes decentralized and open-source social media platforms. Whether you are a user, developer, or simply interested in the concept of decentralized social media, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as the benefits and challenges of decentralized social media, new and existing federated platforms, and more. From the latest developments and trends to ethical considerations and the future of federated social media, this category covers a wide range of topics related to the Fediverse.

founded 2 years ago

Is an "everything" app the likely end state within the Fediverse? (beehaw.org)

submitted 1 year ago by midnightlightning@beehaw.org to c/fediverse@kbin.social

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In the typical web marketing infrastructure, a company signs up for an email account for private messages, Twitter/X account for microblogging, YouTube account for video sharing, and Reddit for forum discussion.

With the Fediverse/ActivityPub model, currently a typical user might register a PeerTube account for video sharing, Mastodon for microblogging, and Lemmy for forum discussion. But the data under all those is the same infrastructure, right?

Facebook as a mature software platform has areas of its app for private messaging, microblogging, and video-specific content, all using one user account.

Is it likely that Fediverse apps will evolve toward a similar structure, where a person or company would only need one account and could push out content of all types there, and interact with others' content with one account?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I doubt it. I admin a lemmy instance and a regular fediverse instance, and I use them both very differently, because their interfaces lend themselves to different uses. Even though they can communicate with each other, trying to navigate a large number of lemmy groups from Hajkey would be annoying, and trying to follow specific users from lemmy would be annoying.

An all in one app would mash that all together, which would probably be overwhelming and confusing

[–] grahamsz@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

But the cool thing about open standards is that there's a clear pathway to creating an everything app. Especially if decentralized ids gain some traction, then we could have an app that combines mastodon and pixelfed but presents the different posts in a sensible way.

I can't really wrap my head around what such an app could look like, but it's much more feasible to build one than it would be with closed services. I'm hopeful that freedom to experiment without lockin will lead to some really neat ideas

[–] wagesj45@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

and a regular fediverse instance

what exactly is this other service you're running?

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Hajkey, which is a fork of Calckey/Firefish. If you're unfamiliar with them, broadly speaking, it's a mastodon alternative with a fancy UI