this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
181 points (98.4% liked)

Canada

7193 readers
513 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Woofcat@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Personally I find this hilarious. The argument that Meta (Facebook) and Google are making "so much money" from Canadian News is in itself laughable. If anything they're helping keep Canadian News relevant by suggesting it to people. No-one forced CBC to go make an instagram account etc.

So I think the law is working great. They demanded if you're going to link to a website you have to pay them a share of the revenue you generate. So these companies have elected that it's not worth the cost and will not link to them. Seemingly the media is going full shocked pikachu over this.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IMO the Federal Goverment went too soft. They should have made a broader law under the form of a tax, where all social medias companies are required to pay a tax to operate in Canada and properly fund journalism, no matter if they display Canadian news or not.

Don't wanna pay? Then no operation in Canada at all.

[–] Woofcat@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why does social media have to fund journalism... they pay taxes here.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not enough if you ask me.

Their incentives is to drive clicks and ad views, while cannibalizing the content producers from their traffic.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't think you've done the critical legwork to evaluate this argument. This looks like a surface level assesment. It's been discussed in more depth in previous threads on the topic.