this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
8 points (78.6% liked)

Vegan

868 readers
8 users here now

A community to discuss anything related to veganism.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The off-grid survivalist dude in invidious video ID “YOXkcz8j3Gc” says milk & potatoes are “nutritionally complete”, which if I understand correctly means that pairing covers the 9 essential amino acids. That’s cool.. but not vegan.

A pescetarian in my family was hospitalized for malnutrition. Not sure what he did wrong or what he was short on, but he doesn’t strike me as someone who would be overly negligent. IMO, as a non-vegan outsider looking in, a vegan diet is easy to screw up & requires some research to stay safe. You can’t just live on rabbit food. So I wonder if the title-linked article has the answers. In short, it claims these pairings are nutritionally complete:

  1. rice & beans
  2. tofu & veg (questionable¹?)
  3. chickpeas & wheat
  4. peanut butter & whole wheat toast²
  5. pinto beans³ & corn
  6. whole wheat pasta & peas
  7. lentils & rice ←I’m bummed it’s not lentils & couscous, which I often use in lentil salad
  8. oatmeal & pumpkin seeds

Note that all links referenced in this post are Cloudflare-free and openly accessible to all. Also no big cookie popups or similar garbage.

footnotes (with questions!):

  1. I find tofu & vegetables suspicious. There are countless vegetables, so this is quite vague. How can we expect any given veg to have whatever tofu is missing? This makes me somewhat skeptical of the whole article.

  2. Why toast? Why not bread?

  3. Or skip the pinto beans and just make sure your corn is infected with a purple fungus containing lysine, assuming #lysine is the reason pinto beans are paired with corn.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cerement -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

derailing the discussion, you can probably sub out most of the grains in the pairings – nutritional profiles of grains are pretty much non-existant (empty carbs and not much else – and since there’s no essential carbs … )

[–] activistPnk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t think that’s derailing.. but trying to understand it. Are you saying the research is bogus… that e.g. rice does not complete the amino acids missing from beans?

[–] cerement 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

it’s the necessary quantities – rice has the amino acids but at such low levels you end up overeating to make up for the lack – substituting in vegetables or fruits that make up the missing components would make for a better pairing and offer additional nutritional benefits

[–] activistPnk 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

rice has the amino acids but at such low levels you end up overeating to make up for the lack

You seem to be contradicting the article posted by @goldfishlaser@slrpnk.net:

http://green.michaelahgu3sqef5yz3u242nok2uczduq5oxqfkwq646tvjhdnl35id.onion/2014/10/20/complete-protein-ratios/

which concludes equal parts of beans & rice by volume are significantly balanced. I assume he means dry beans and dry rice, by volume, which is usually what I use.

(update) I suppose it’s possible for you to both be right if beans are also a “grain” & thus also low in amino acids to the same extent as rice.