this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
44 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

3613 readers
118 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cooopsspace@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's wild is, instead of banks turning off the tap and telling people they can't borrow more they were enabled and allowed to continue becoming oberindebted.

This is the reason why we should be strengthening and not weakening responsible lending laws.

House prices can't go up if you're literally not allowed to overpay for them.

[–] Designate6361@lemmy.letthewookiee.win 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

aww yeah its crazy, even during 2022 we went back to the bank for pre-approval and yeah we had more money saved for a deposit but what they offered us was way above what they offered us the year before. And then is when economists were saying we need to reign it in or the market will pop.

[–] cooopsspace@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Every time I see an article like "they paid 1.4 mil for a 1 mil property" I ask the question, how were they allowed to overpay that much? I'd actually argue they shouldn't have been allowed to.

[–] Designate6361@lemmy.letthewookiee.win 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They came in with 10% deposit that mum and dad helped with and in some cases mum and dad were the guarantors.

[–] cooopsspace@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago

In a lot of cases they were spending mum and dad's money too, or nepositism to a senior position at daddy's work.

[–] Mittens_meow@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Because at the time, everything was overpriced. Easy to make judgements with hindsight