this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
846 points (96.9% liked)

linuxmemes

21172 readers
809 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] MTLion3@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    They’re adding DRM? In what way?

    [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 68 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Basically by allowing websites to refuse to load unless the browser the operating system running the browser promises that the user isn't allowed to know what the computer is doing. And Google super duper promises this won't be used for evil.

    https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/07/googles-web-integrity-api-sounds-like-drm-for-the-web/

    [–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    allowing websites to refuse to load unless the browser the operating system running the browser promises that the user isn’t allowed to know what the computer is doing

    So they won't support Linux anymore?

    [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

    That seems to be the message everyone is drawing from this.

    I think it'll be more insidious than that, there will be Linux, but only "signed, verified" Linux will be allowed, and the only Linux distributions that will make that list are the ones with corporate or government versions. Specifically distributions like Google's Android, IBM's Red Hat, Canonical's Ubuntu, and China's Kylin.

    This is still as horrible. Imagine Ubuntu winning the snap vs flatpack exchange, because their OS is 'legit', whereas every other distro is pushed out, because it's too much work to install an unsigned OS.

    [–] MTLion3@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Yeah, I’m sure they fucking do lol Glad I use a combination of it, Firefox, and Opera GX now to diversify

    [–] msage@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Everything not Firefox or Safari is Chromium based.

    [–] MTLion3@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

    Then I guess I'm still glad that's in my mix lol

    [–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

    You can read a little about it here

    I also encourage you to look at the GitHub...be warned that there are some quite angry folks on there

    [–] MTLion3@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

    Understandable lol