this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
48 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

23 readers
2 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 2 years ago
 

We were easy marks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hypx@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hydrogen is not gasoline nor diesel. This is a ridiculous argument.

Hydrogen can be pipelined at 1/10 the cost of sending electricity via wires. If you actually paid attention to the conversation instead of spamming BEV propaganda, you’d notice that I said that already.

It will cost over a trillion dollars to put up enough charging stations for all cars. For hydrogen, it will be far less. Those are facts you cannot deny.

This is just BEV fanboyism run amok. The world will not head towards a BEV monoculture with zero alternatives. The fact that we’re even having this conversation shows how much brainwashing is going on. It is so extreme that it is evidence that BEVs are secretly in big trouble. Otherwise, why do BEV fans need to spam FUD and marketing propaganda like there is no tomorrow? It shows a type of insecurity that suggests BEV fans actually do not really believe their own claims.

[–] keeb420@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

and where do you think hydrogen pumps are gonna be installed? oh yeah, existing gas stations as that makes sense for the type of fuel it is which can very much have contamination issues. and how much will it take to run these hydrogen pipelines to these stations? cause they dont exist now. and that not even talking about producing hydrogen. we might get green hydrogen in the future but today the vast majority isnt. meanwhile theres plenty of electric wires already in place.

[–] Hypx@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are replacing gas stations with hydrogen stations. You are removing contamination issues. And again, it is far cheaper to put hydrogen pipelines than wires. The economics will drive adoption. People will choose the cheaper option over the more expensive one. You are just advocating the status quo and insisting that nothing can change.

[–] keeb420@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

so youre suggesting its cheaper to run pipeline than it is to tie into the existing electrical grid?

and that not even going into hydrogen like to leak from any hole it can find so those pipeline have to be perfect all the time.

im not saying things cant change, just that weve already moved on from what hydrogen was meant to be. theres no point to use electricity to produce hydrogen, in the cleanest form, only to eventually turn it back into electricity. when we can just use electricity from the beginning cutting out a lot of losses.

[–] Hypx@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not suggesting. I brought sources indication that this, in fact, is the case.

Most of your counterarguments are just fearmongering. As if engineers haven't already looked at these issues before making such claims. In reality, it is the cheaper idea by far. BEV fanatics are just spamming propaganda in order to deny these facts. It is frankly out-of-control and it is a sign of desperation.

[–] keeb420@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Its cheaper to install a DC fast charger than it is a mile of pipeline. And that's not even including the pumps themselves.

average pipeline costs are $155,000 per inch-mile, varying
regionally.
– The average cost was $94,000 per inch-mile in the 2011 Study.

https://ingaa.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/21527.pdf

[–] Hypx@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You get significantly more capacity with a pipeline than with wires. You are just obfuscating the facts.

[–] keeb420@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Still doesn't make it any cheaper to get the pipeline from who knows where to the station. Much less building the station. And is shell and BP and whomever else gonna run their own pipelines or are they gonna be shared?

[–] Hypx@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where does the electricity for charging stations come from? BEV fans never answer this question honestly. They just pretend it will just be green electricity. In reality, this is an extremely hard problem. By the time you figure a way to guarantee green electricity, you'd realize that you're making hydrogen for energy storage already. So in truth, the solution will involve hydrogen no matter what.

[–] keeb420@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wind, solar, hydro, or hell even coal as it would still be cleaner than an ice vehicle. And no we don't need to store electric as hydrogen, we can store electricity as electricity it's called a battery.

[–] Hypx@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

You're not comparing to a ICE car. You're comparing it to a hydrogen car. A BEV running on dirty energy is going to be much worse than a hydrogen car on green energy.

Storing it in a battery would be incredibly expensive at scale. The point of hydrogen is that you can store large quantities of it.