politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I think that is an interesting view on consent, and I am glad to not share it.
I'm not really sure how my not blocking of people I disagree with has anything to do with consent.
Please elaborate.
Well I am taking what you are saying as an implied superior moral position. That engaging with anyone and everyone is ethically or morally superior to not. It follows that one who does not consent to that standard is somehow "doing it wrong". It's like some internalized guilt over exercising your own agency to ignore or block people. Wild.
So... You've just made a ton of assumptions about me and then left a comment based on those assumptions.
I don't think I am inherently above others because I don't block people.
I do think that blocking out everyone you don't agree with entirely is unhealthy and leads to other problems such as an echo chamber, but you are absolutely right that they can do whatever they want.
I urge people to talk to people they don't necessarily get along with whenever possible. It's the only way to gain new perspectives and maybe look at things in a way you otherwise might not have.
If you only ever interact with people who all agree with you on everything anyways what does that get you? I'm not saying you have to agree withï other people, but it's good to know what other perspectives people have. It just allows you to stay more well rounded and informed at all times I think.
Ignore/block whoever you want. Obviously for mental health or sanity sake you do what you have to do. I have no issues with blocking people who are harassing me or anything like that, but I don't just instantly block people when they say something I disagree with.
Hope that helps clarity my position on the whole instantly blocking mentality that a lot of people have these days.
Not having to talk to Nazis doesn't mean you're in an echo chamber. I hope that clears up the misunderstanding here.
It is a problem when you label everyone that disagrees with you as a Nazi.
I have repeatedly stated on multiple occasions how much of a not Nazi I am but many people here have already labeled me as such.
You want me to get a notary to verify signed statements from all my minority and Jewish friends about how much of not a Nazi I am?
Like I understand what you're saying when taken as a statement in a vacuum, but that's not really accurate to what's happened here.
"I have Jewish friends"
Dude this is pretty close to parody and I will need to make this part of a standup routine.
Even when I accidentally got mistaken as KKK for Halloween (I was in a white lab suit with an 🏖️ corp badge but took my hood off), I did not have to profess with words. I simply stripped the costume immediately off with shameful realization. My actual Jewish friend laughed at me.
Like I agree this isn't happening in a vacuum, the context is you defending a guy doing a Nazi salute. People not subjecting themselves to whatever brain rot brought you to that conclusion is not "living in a bubble", it's having a healthy relationship with reality.
... You wore a costume that someone else accidentally mistook you for the kkk so instead of explaining the costume you just took off your costume in "shameful realization".
That is actually hella embarrassing for you. Not because you got mistaken for a kkk member that happens all the time with any costume that is primarily white robes (usually it's ghosts tho), but the fact that you took it off out of shame rather than simply explaining it or just not giving a shit is wild to me. I would never in a million years let what someone else thinks about me control what I do.
My "I have Jewish friends" comment was poking fun at how fucking ridiculous you sound. I should have put a /s so your clown ass could catch the joke I was making. That one is on me for assuming you had at least a few brain cells accidentally bouncing around upstairs.
Only one of us has a healthy grasp on reality and I am sorry to break it to you, but it ain't you man.
Anyways I am over this whole conversation with you. It's become abundantly clear to me that you are set in your ways and you see nothing wrong with it so I'm not gonna waste any more energy trying to have any sort of meaningful dialogue.
Have a good night.
As we say on the Internet, every accusation is a confession. At least you understand there's a hueristic to identifying people not worth conversing with, and for most of us defending Nazi stuff is that heuristic.
Yeah.... Except I started out thinking he did do a Nazi Salute. I first saw a gif of only the salutes and I thought "no fucking way he just did that". Then i saw a slightly longer video that had music over it or whatever and I was still very shocked but it really looked like he had just done two Salutes on live TV.
Then I finally got home and was able to watch the full speech with original audio and most importantly all the context of the whole thing.
As I learned more information about the situation I changed my stance. It's ok to make a gut reaction and then reevaluate once you learn more info.
How did you ever assume it was the nazi salute if you require hearing the "heil Hitler" in conjunction with the motion?