this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
10 points (85.7% liked)

UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1239 readers
2 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.


New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide


Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.


Community Spotlight

Featured Posts and User Investigations


Useful Links


Community Rules


Other Communities

!uapmemes@lemmy.world


If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I could be wrong, but I don't believe Speaker McCarthy will offer much resistance to this request. What are your thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HM05_Me@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Regardless of your thought on UAP, there are claims of abuse of spending with the DOD. Do you honestly think we shouldn't investigate claims of government abuse of funding? This is more than just about UAP it's about groups in the government working without oversight.

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is my thought as well. Regardless of whether UAPs are prosaic or non-prosaic, there are still accusations under oath of murder and misappropriation of government funds/bypassing government oversight. These things are a big deal.

[–] spaceape@lemmy.nrsk.no 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not to be too cynical but it seems misappropriated tax dollars are a bigger scandal to the US establishment and public than the secret services killing people in the name of national security.

I believe most people would agree that some state secrets are worth killing for, and if this secret is worth killing for will be a matter of debate.

But I think nobody would agree misappropriating tax dollars or even funding legitimate closed Special Access Programs without government oversight is ever OK.

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Unusual bipartisanship in the American political climate is a major clue for me, signifying the importance of this matter, whatever its outcome might be. Typically, the two sides struggle to reach consensus even on basic facts, but here we find them united on this issue. Clearly, something is happening behind the scenes.

[–] spaceape@lemmy.nrsk.no 2 points 1 year ago

A very powerful cross-standpoint argument I've not really considered since it's not my tax dollars.