this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
939 points (96.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

19512 readers
316 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eevee@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Haarukkateroitin@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Laughs in frameset!

Kids nowdays try hard to do with divs what was already possible with framesets.

Also I feel bad every time I remember that was taken away from us!

[–] smpl@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What do you mean? I still write my sites in HTML 4.1 and frameset works fine in all the browsers I've tried. HTML 4.1 is still a standard, I can only recommend more people use it. HTML5 isn't really a standard.. it's a "living document".. pff.

``

You're allowed to <center> things and use `` without shame... or if you really do prefer it, you can still wrap that relative positioned <div> with auto margins in an absolute positioned parent <div> or whatever CSS bullshit makes stuff centered nowadays.

One thing I always though was very backwards in CSS is the paradigme to make <div> into tables instead of the other way. Tables are an easy and simple way to layout things and if it could degrade into divs you'd have your responsive design making many related CSS standards unnecessary.

[–] traches@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're insane if you think doing layouts with tables is easier than flexbox/grid.

[–] smpl@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the context of the modern web, I take that as a badge of honor. I've build pages using flexbox/grid and I've done so only for the sake of responsive layout, because of the way that tables can't degrade to a bunch of boxes, but a bunch of boxes can by styled to look like a table. It is a convoluted way of doing table layout instead of just using a table.

[–] traches@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A table has semantic meaning: it's for presenting tabulated data, not for building layouts. That's why they behave the way they do and require the format they require. Table layouts have always been a hack, it's just that for awhile there weren't better options.

Again, you are insane if you're still doing table layouts in 2023.

[–] dot20@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sheriff? Yes, this commenter right here.

[–] smpl@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh no you wouldn't..

  • knocks on door
  • It's the Wild Web Sheriff!
  • What the.. You'll never catch me!
  • rumble
  • a vase breaks
  • silence
  • Okay, okay I was just kidding. Tables are bad. HTML5 is the future.
[–] dot20@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

“And so the Gods (also known as the W3C) spoke down to the Programmers and said: ‘You shall not use tables for non-tabular data.’ And so it was.”