this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
893 points (96.9% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

622 readers
289 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

A fall from greatness is inevitable and I'm afraid that the fall of America, with all of her hubris, is going to be spectacularly bloody and unpleasant for everyone. :(

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

When exactly was this greatness America is falling from? Was it back when things were built off the backs of slaves? Was it back when women were not allowed to vote or be professors? Was it back when interracial marriage was illegal? Was it back when gay marriage was illegal? When was it?

[–] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I get what you're saying, but the greatness I'm speaking of refers to geopolitical and economic greatness, and I hold no illusions that it is wholesome.

To literally answer your question, USA as a superpower came to be following the Second World War, more or less.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I get it. Under the harsh control of fathers who beat their wives(considered perfectly acceptable in society) while taking advantage of black and Chinese laborers and pursuing coverups to further the chemical industry at the expense of its citizen's health, we should all be ecstatic to fall from that tanted and corrupt "greatness".

[–] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what you're trying to say, honestly.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That there is no "greatness" from which America can fall because it hasn't been.

[–] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you going to sit there with a straight face and tell me that USA hasn't dominated economically and geopolitically for most of the 80 years since the end of WW2?

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Are you going to sit there with a straight face and tell me that USA hasn’t dominated

Depends on how you pick your yardsticks, right. Health outcomes. Lifespan, gun deaths in schools. Happiness metrics. Mental health metrics. Academic achievement.

But I guess we have geopolitical power going for us, so thats nice. I do like that we have some of the largest food portions in the world, especially of coffee. I can feel a bit smug about that.

I've seen 31 ounce "trenta" coffees at some starbucks, but you have to find a QuickTrip gas station and bring your own mug (up to 100 ounces) for 1.50 to really have a proper cup of coffee.

Go to france and its like 6 ounces. (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻

[–] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Depends on how you pick your yardsticks,

I literally defined the yardstick already and you cut it off right out of my quote. Don't do that.

Look, you've got an axe to grind with the USA and for good reasons, but you're twisting my words to hear something I'm not saying.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know you defined your yardstick. My comment was to say that your choice of measure shouldnt be considered a comprehensive measure.

[–] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 1 points 23 hours ago

Of course it shouldn't. Who's suggesting that?