Fedigrow

722 readers

201 users here now

To discuss how to grow and manage communities / magazines on Lemmy, Mbin, Piefed and Sublinks

founded 8 months ago

MODERATORS

Blaze@lemm.ee

threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works

Idea: having a political-free instance for new joiners (feddit.org)

submitted 15 hours ago by Blaze@feddit.org to c/fedigrow@lemm.ee

87 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hello everyone,

Thinking about this as the on-boarding experience on Lemmy can be subpar, especially because new joiners have to

find a list of communities they could like (something like this post https://feddit.org/post/6554534, but should be there as a default)
browse All and stumble upon all the news, political and tech that we know (https://lemmy.world/?dataType=Post&sort=TopDay)

In order to avoid this, what would you think of having a "new joiners" instance, where

hexbear, lemmygrad and ml would be defederated
politics and news communities would be blocked at the instance level

That could help to onboard people, so that the first time they look around, they see more gardening, cute comics and casual conversation rather than another set of depressing memes.

Disclaimer: politics and societal issues are important and should be discussed extensively (they are quite popular on Lemmy, let's be honest). I'm not advocating to hide them all, just to not show them as the first content people potentially interested in Lemmy would see.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 2 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

On Lemmy I feel the server doesn’t matter as much since you can just join communities after account creation and communicate with other servers anyway.

Experience for someone joining today and almost leaving Lemmy altogether because the instance they picked was laggy and not federating properly

yeah this instance I’m on sucks. Realizing now that it definitely does not let you access everything from there. A lot of communities I’ve searched for and thought were missing just aren’t showing up in myserv.one’s search results. Here I was thinking that there wasn’t even a functional non-binary community in the lemmyverse or fediverse or whatever.

[+] Rob200@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (4 children)

[deleted]

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 1 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

I am aware of the way to solve the issue, but expecting a new joiner who just registered on the platform to copy-paste the communities links from a third-party website to the search to fetch them is unrealistic.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

This is a major issue.

New users run the gamut of tech neophyte to very old hands. Both have reasons for not wanting to do this, even more, not knowing this can be done. As part of the "old hand" crowd, frankly I don't have the time to go look for this stuff - it really needs to be upfront when you join.

I think, overall, what you're talking about is the Discovery process for a new user. And with new users being new to lemmy, they don't understand how it all works. I've yet to sign up to a new instance and have anything clarified, up front - how lemmy works, and not just "federated like email", but how your stuff isn't replicated (I get this, but most people don't automatically get the implications of "federated, like email"). Also, what communities they federate, what they block, etc, again, in detail. This isn't done because documentation is hard, no one likes to do it - I'm as guilty of this as anyone.

Getting new servers to do this would be challenging, but just like the sidebar for a community, it's really crucial.

I think you're on to a good idea.

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 0 points 13 hours ago

This isn’t done because documentation is hard, no one likes to do it - I’m as guilty of this as anyone.

There are a few posts on !newtolemmy@lemmy.ca, but they are far from exhaustive, and how to get new users there automatically is another challenge.

load more comments (1 replies)