/kbin meta

4 readers

1 users here now

Magazine dedicated to discussions about the kbin itself. Provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics. ---- * Roadmap 2023 * m/kbinDevlog * m/kbinDesign

founded 1 year ago

Who are the current admins of kbin.social? /m/fediverse needs moderators (kbin.social)

submitted 1 year ago by cacheson@kbin.social to c/kbinMeta@kbin.social

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

There's currently a spam "buy adderall" post on /m/fediverse that's been up for 16 hours now. The magazine has no moderators other than Ernest.

I also remember hearing at some point that kbin.social was being run by some other admins so that Ernest could focus on code, but I don't know who they are. Does anyone else know who we should be pinging for issues like this?

One additional question, is there an issue tracker for problems/requests that are specific to kbin.social, rather than the kbin codebase? It doesn't make sense to fill up the issue tracker on codeberg with "this magazine needs moderators" requests and the like, but we do need somewhere to keep track.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bedbeard@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was thinking this also when I saw some thai football (or something) related posts in /m/cats. The sole moderator is @Jay, who has never posted anything. At all. And they are also the sole moderator of /m/iphone and /m/chicagobears.

I know there was talk of reclaiming a magazine abandoned by the mod like this but I think it really needs to be addressed soon, as currently you can spam anywhere quite successfully (like the drug post in /m/fediverse) and even with downvotes the post will be on the front page for quite some time.

[–] density@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

@bedbeard my feeling is that when this thing got off the ground, some people had the idea to snag a few prime communities. Maybe with good intentions that they never followed through on.

It would be interesting if anyone was able to programatically look through communities to see what is going on in terms of a) user reports, b) mod actions, c) mod participation in community, d) if the mod accounts are active at all (even outside the community). I think all that information is public. (Maybe not the reports themselves?)