Technology

23 readers

2 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 2 years ago

Wouldn't the Everything App Be the Last Thing We Would Want? (kbin.social)

submitted 1 year ago by curt@kbin.social to c/tech@kbin.social

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I read an article in the New York Times about Elon Musk wanting to make X, formally known as Twitter, into an everything app. The article also mentions other attempts. Would that be the last thing we would want?

I can see why Elon would want it: total domination of the app market and massive profits. While a user might find it convenient, it would be a total lock in to one app that would make it difficult to move to other apps. If the app went under, a likelihood for X under Elon's control, the user becomes completely disconnected. The app would also be the dream target of hackers trying to steal all you data.

It's not that hard to use multiple apps. I'm sure most of us have dozens of them. I have high security on my financial apps and not so much on my social apps. I don't want to do two step verification to get back into kbin every time I get logged out. Specialize apps for specific purposes makes a lot more sense to me.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] trynn@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yep. Musk is basing his idea about having an "everything app" on WeChat's success in China, which basically does what he's talking about. The problem is that he doesn't seem to understand that there are cultural differences at play between Chinese users and western users that prevent mass-adoption of a single app to do everything in the west, and that WeChat already exists and isn't popular in the west at all.

[–] iLikeGoats@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

There are more than cultural differences. WeChat is a surveillance app for the masses by the State. This is not an exaggeration.

[–] QHC@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is it a cultural difference, or is it a combination of China being a more restricted market and the first wave of smart phone apps being aimed primarily at the English-speaking world? I am sure some of the apps that Westerners use were not available in China, either because they weren't allowed (e.g. financial services) or were not aimed at that market (e.g. Twitter), at least not initially.

Reminds me of how in high school, my different friend groups used different IM clients, but it was just a fluke of which gained mass appeal first in each community.

[–] bedrooms@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think SNS is a mass game. When WeChat started my friends used it to hit random girls nearby. Just shake the phone and connect.

Once it dominates a population you have no choice because none of your friends has a WhatsApp account.

[–] trynn@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

That's a good point, but I'm fairly sure culture plays a part as well. It's likely some combination.