this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
316 points (95.4% liked)

World News

39371 readers
3773 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump criticized Panama Canal fees as “ridiculous” and demanded lower costs or the canal’s return to the US.

In a Truth Social post, Trump also expressed concern about potential Chinese influence over the waterway, despite no direct Chinese control of canal operations.

The canal, transferred to Panama in 1999, is vital for global trade, handling 5% of maritime traffic.

Trump’s comments follow record revenues of $5 billion announced by the Panama Canal Authority. Panama has not yet responded to his statements.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The canal is on a crash course with climate change. They're going to need absolutely massive investment to operate once the lake dries up, and they're not pulling in massive profits to pay for that. If Trump wants lower fees, he best be ready to pay for them. The reality though is that he's probably just betting on failure.

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You may think me mad but it is like this Trump fella doesn't have the best interests at heart for the ole U.S. of A.

[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Vaggumon@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

You misspelled Fleshlight

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

So I guess the drought finally eased, and the reservoir that supplies the fresh water for the locks is doing better, but yeah, even with a new dam that should finally get started soon, the canal probably has 50 years or less as a viable commercial route, though honestly 150+ years isn't a bad run as an economic project, and one of Jimmy Carter's most humane legacies was overseeing its transfer back to the people who were dominated into letting Americans build it in the first place.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You seriously think Trump is considering further out than next months news cycle?

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I think someone looking to milk billions in government contracts has been talking to Trump, and offering kick backs.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I watched a documentary that the canal also tamed the yearly monsoon. I think that's where they get the water. Granted we're in for a rollercoaster on rain too.