this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
1161 points (89.4% liked)

Malicious Compliance

19527 readers
4 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] krayj@lemmy.world 149 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I think it would have been fair to have a rule saying "no surgical modifications"... because doing things like facelift, nose-job, breast/buttox implants, cheek lifts, wrinkle removal, etc, are obviously unfair advantages (in a beauty contest) for those who have the money pay for it; and having a generic blanket rule like that would have accomplished the same thing they were trying to accomplish without being so blatantly transphobic... so a rule like what they have only proves that they are both despicable AND dumb. The entire notion of beauty pageants is outdated and stupid if you ask me.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lol, you implement that and basically all beauty pageants stop existing. Which would be a good thing, mind you. But I've never met a pageant contestant in my life that isn't … let's say … heavily enhanced by medical procedures.

[–] Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

which would be a good thing

Based

[–] Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think it would have been fair to have a rule saying “no surgical modifications”…

How are you intending to prove that that? Only the bad surgery makes itself obvious.

[–] krayj@lemmy.world 74 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Like any kind of contest, finding rules violations is hard and not foolproof. It's like sports that forbid using steroids - competitors do regularly take those substances while training, then quit taking them for competition and go uncaught. Competitors who are discovered later to have been violating rules are stripped of titles.

That said, I don't think it's a very controversial concept that a beauty pageant shouldn't be a contest about who could afford the best surgeons. Well - as I said earlier I think beauty pageants are absurd to begin with, but if they have to exist I don't think it should be a contest between surgeons.

[–] Deuces@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Though I would watch one that was a contest between surgeons. I imagine it'd start pretty tame, but the first time a girl with cat ears wins, were only like 5 years from the really crazy shit

[–] Reliant1087@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

This would be hilarious if it happened.

[–] Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are absurd and it'll probably be a good thing when we've got past their existence. But the problem here is that proving surgery is essentially impossible. It's quite unlike drugs that you can test for. Maybe implants you could test for but that's just one thing, and I'm not sure that beauty pageants even have the kind of budget required for advanced tests.

[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

One of the contest’s rules says you can’t participate if you willingly had a nude photo took in your lifetime. Good luck proving that (not even considering how it’s a honeypot for revenge porn to surface)

[–] SamboT@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does saline glow under a blacklight?

[–] chocobo13z@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago

Only if you drink enough Gatorade 😂

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

On the one hand, that might work. On the other hand, who gives a fuck about the rules in a contest with arbitrary standards?

[–] betheydocrime@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

So, no contestants who have had their wisdom teeth removed? No one allowed who has had a C-section? No cancer patients who have had biopsies done?