this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
98 points (96.2% liked)

politics

19239 readers
3659 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I won't cry for Cheney, who spent her life feeding the beast that's eating her now, but this is a horrendous precedent and someone should stop it.

The lawsuit will happen so there's no stopping that precedent. The only good precedent that can be set is actually taking these phony lawsuits into court where their superpower, lying, has no affect.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (3 children)

There was an opportunity to do that a little over a month ago. But because Democrats didn't put up the god-perfect candidate, voters opted for the dictator, then complained when he started acting like a dictator.

[–] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

I don’t think they are complaining yet. Precious few of us truly care about the rule of law.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems -2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Well the important thing here is that you learned your party needs to run better candidates if they want to win. I certainly hope we learned our lesson.

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well the important thing here is that you learned your party needs to run better candidates if they want to win.

Well if its not your party why would we want your advice? It sounds like you are someone who has set themselves up to be a lifetime loser in politics who will never win and has never won.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 3 days ago

laughs while taking his kids to a park on a local bike lane all built in the last few years

Buddy, I don't identify with a political party or ideology. These are tools to deliver material gains for your community.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Well the important thing here is that you learned your party needs to run better candidates if they want to win

The saddest part of it is people who keep dredging up this inane reasoning understand neither the irony or stupidity involved in it.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 0 points 6 days ago

Is it irony to know voters are dumb and then expect them to know better? Definitely stupid.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No one asked for god-perfect, they asked for not shit and who cared about their concerns.

Sadly the DNC decided they know what’s best for everyone and threw the election.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Sadly the DNC decided they know what’s best for everyone and threw the election.

Funny, I must have missed the phone call where the DNC told me to just stay home and let Trump win.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 6 points 1 week ago

Yeah, this isn't a Godzilla vs Kong situation. More like the blob absorbing and growing bigger.