this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
72 points (95.0% liked)
Shows and TV
661 readers
51 users here now
Open discussion of Media / Shows / Television
- Be nice
- Don't go off topic
- Don't rage farm
Other communities
We are still open to mod application, please comment on this post: https://lemm.ee/post/40675177
founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I can't believe executives aren't looking at this reboot/remake phase and going like "reusing IP is great, let's make new IP so that we can make new franchises"
Creating new IP is a long term strategy that harms short term objectives at the benefit of long term ones.
Most execs are not incentivized to do anything but max this quarters profit. Execs are only concerned with the immediate as their salaries are based on quarterly and annual objectives.
The system is designed to race to the bottom. Who can create the most revenue while providing the very least to the consumer.
Fair point. That's why I wouldn't be shocked to see theatrical re-releases overshadow new movies at the cinemas within the next few years.
That doesn't guarantee number go up.
We must fail to create and learn, without failure there is no growth and sometimes those failures birth something spectacular. Our system has us at a stranglehold, it stifles and discourages creative solutions, and the stories we tell reflect this. There is no future if we continue like this. This is a symptom of a sick system.
Yup. The system doesn't know how to predict properly on new IP. They know that existing IP has an existing fan base and can have its own virality and marketing built in, so they can plug it into these "models" and forecast revenue and stuff so these guys can have jobs. That's why we get another culturally irrelevant live action Disney remake. More of the artform is getting soulless over time.