this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
86 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

60085 readers
3815 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mriguy@lemmy.world 73 points 1 week ago (15 children)

I’m sure that’s a much more effective than trying to build up US companies to make solar panels.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago (6 children)

build up US companies to make solar panels.

One would expect it to have that effect. If X is more expensive to obtain abroad, then you'll tend to have more domestic capacity being developed -- as long as it's believed that the tariffs aren't going to go away in the near future, since otherwise, anyone investing in solar manufacturing capacity stands to lose their investment.

[–] Breve@pawb.social 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Except this move is likely less about promoting domestic solar production and more about protecting oil, gas, and coal by making green energy alternatives more expensive.

[–] JustJack23 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Exactly, if that was the only way to produce electricity maybe there is an argument that tariffs will stimulate domestic production, but in this case i think this will just hinder the transition to renewable energy sources.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)