this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
223 points (84.5% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5393 readers
182 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7
223
Eating less meat ‘like taking 8m cars off road’ (www.bbc.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/climate
166 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Raising animals costs a huge amount of money. Who can afford to raise animals that aren’t selling?

[–] JustJack23 -1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Good point, but the market is very inefficient system for determining supply.

And big companies have other methods for dealing with low demand like

  • Lobby the government (and the government will give in)
  • Just targeting rich people. It is known that they contribute to climate change much more than working class people. As long as the rich are free to do whatever they like the planet will continue to rot.
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It would still be way less profitable in the end and would raise questions by the public as to why so much money being wasted on a cruel inefficient system.

[–] JustJack23 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That is what I am saying it will become less profitable after years, we need climate change solutions now.

And most people are very good at ignoring cruelty.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

The People who want baby steps don’t give a damn about the environment. It’s just business as usual for them.

load more comments (4 replies)