this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
100 points (96.3% liked)

Trams, Trolleys and Streetcars

691 readers
60 users here now

A Community for the interessting world of Trams, Trolleys and Streetcars!

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] poVoq 9 points 1 day ago (10 children)
[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Probably a lack of flexibility. Railway is the king of inter-city cargo, but the limited capacity and fixed routes and schedules make trams less efficient in populated areas.

[–] poVoq 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can speculate myself 😅 But I was interested in the actual reason, as delivering packages to specific postal lockers would work very well if those lockers are placed near the tram stations, which they often are.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

From a brief googling on DDG: https://www.railwaygazette.com/light-rail-and-tram/parcels-by-tram-project-ends/66165.article

It was a trial run, and there wasn't enough demand. The trams also weren't permitted to carry passengers.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

They took our data, we'll take their trademark.

[–] poVoq -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks. Seems like bureocratic red tape killed the idea then... not surprised.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"there was lack of demand, and it couldn't also take passengers"

But hey, keep on reinterpreting words to support your preconceptions.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

I think they're saying not allowing it to carry passengers was bureaucratic red tape. What's the reason for that?

[–] poVoq 1 points 1 day ago

If you had read the article it would be clear that both of these were the result of bureocratic red tape, but I guess that is too much to ask from some people here 🙄

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)