Comic Strips

12946 readers

3255 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
The comic must be a complete story.
If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
You may post comics from others or your own.
If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
Politeness.
Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.

Web of links

!linuxmemes@lemmy.world: "I use Arch btw"
!memes@lemmy.world: memes (you don't say!)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

lawrence@lemmy.world

855

Rational Self-Interest (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 2 weeks ago by yellow_matter_custard@sh.itjust.works to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world

85 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's all very fair and sensible.

I can see it being very frustrating if people's first response to ideologies close to you is dunk on Rand rather than actually engaging with what you're trying to say.

I think a better critique of "rational self interest" if you're looking for one would be that it can be argued to be either too widespread to have meaning (the flip side of "I don't agree with them/am starting from different axioms thus they're irrational"), or too narrow and thus never actually employed.

It is a shame that other Rational Self-interest philosophies don't get their time in the sun... While Rand I hear is still required/recommended reading in some schools.
An advantage of writing fiction to articulate your ideas I suppose.

[–] WatDabney@fedia.io 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mostly like "rational self-interest" as a sort of framing device.

I believe egoism to be a fact. I think every choice that * every* person makes is self-interested, even those that appear to be entirely altruistic.

Presuming that to be true, there are two things that I consider vital - that people are aware that that's what they're doing, and that they focus on doing it as rationally as possible.

And yes - "rational" is a slippery concept. The details are elusive at best, and much more to the point, necessarily subjective (which IMO is the part that Rand most vividly got wrong and Stirner, by contrast, got right). But while that means that a sort of universal formalization of the concept would be difficult at best, I tend to think it's not necessary - that if people essentially stay within the guardrails of "rational self-interest" and maintain some measure of intellectual honesty and sound critical thinking, whatever it might all shake out to be couldn't help but be at the very least more broadly good than bad, and certainly more broadly good than the various delusional authoritarianisms to which we're subjected.

Thanks for the response.

[–] Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

You're most welcome.

Guess I'll see you sometime in the comments of an altruism vs. selfish satisfaction of doing a good deed post.

I agree with much of all you've said in theory, and you have a consistent ideology and that's, in my opinion, the most important starting point.