this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024
87 points (94.8% liked)

World News

39332 readers
3315 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Rebels in Syria, led by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), have launched their first major offensive on Aleppo since 2016, threatening a potential shift in the 13-year civil war.

The attack targets a city historically vital to Syria’s economy, previously reclaimed by President Assad with Russian support.

This resurgence could destabilize the region, involving players like Russia, Turkey, and Iran, while creating openings for ISIS.

HTS, previously linked to al-Qaida, has sought legitimacy but remains controversial. The fighting raises concerns of regional escalation amid other Middle Eastern conflicts.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Goes to show how much the media controls our knowledge on current affairs.

Not necessarily. It just means you aren't active enough to go out of your own information bubble. Plenty of news sources would mention many things.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

They probably meant the hegemonic narrative rather than just "news sources". Sure, there are alternatives but they're completely marginalized.

[–] Track_Shovel 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This.

And a bit of what he's talking about. I live under a rock with isopods for the most part. I stopped watching the news on TV years ago, and have really reduced the effort I put into keeping up with world events because of how discouraging it is, and how much I've come to realize said narratives are primarily competing propaganda narratives.

It's insanely hard to find a modicum of truth in the sea of shit out there, and journalistic integrity has largely fallen by the wayside.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I also pretty much stopped watching TV as well. Online has more varied news sources.