this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
261 points (95.5% liked)

AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

943 readers
514 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

① Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

② Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

③ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

④ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

⑤ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

 

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
DougHolland@lemmy.world
261
Ignoring the climate emergency (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 month ago by DougHolland@lemmy.world to c/aiop@lemmy.world
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

• ‘Catastrophic’ marine heatwaves are killing sealife and causing mass disruption to UK fisheries

• Climate change is spoiling food faster, making hundreds of millions of people sick around the world

• Slender-billed curlew goes extinct     (archived link)

• Extreme drought in Colorado could come every 6 years — instead of every 1,000 — due to climate change, study finds     (archived link)

• Greenland's meltwater will slow Atlantic circulation, climate model suggests     (archived link)

• Historically bad year for dolphin strandings on Cape Cod has scientists looking for answers     (archived link)

• Landslides are a growing climate threat

• Climate change makes vaccines more important—while also undercutting them

• Plastics contribute to 'triple planetary crisis' impacts     (archived link)

   
Previously

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ppue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Per capita isn't really important in this case. Overall output is. The planet doesn't care if it's getting less per capita from one place or another.

I don't see any value in that approach except for finger pointing and doomer posting.

Then, the other thing is that your graph is just CO2.

No, it is CO2eq.