this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
389 points (99.0% liked)

PC Gaming

8625 readers
1100 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Skyline969@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Hopefully this nonsense doesn’t affect the LTSC version. Using that has been a breath of fresh air - still Windows, less crap. Not even the store is installed by default.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago

It doesn't. I doubt it will in the future, but its possible.

I still would recommend moving to another solution though.

[–] fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Schal330@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Long Term Service Channel. It's a branch that is used by devices that may not be recommended to be on the latest version of Windows, for example ATMs. When the device needs to essentially be consistently reliable and not received feature updates that could potentially break it.

[–] Skyline969@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Basically, yeah. Features don’t come out often but you still get security updates on the regular which is what’s important. Things don’t change which means things don’t typically break.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yes, but the entirety of windows is crap.

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

Windows has ease on its side. I've never had to learn CMD to achieve basic tasks in Windows and that's one of, if not the biggest point against Linux.

[–] blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In my opinion, not entirely, the underlying NT kernel seems better designed than Linux.
Windows 7 was very good, later versions were turned into crap.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

From what I read through the years, NT actually had design behind it, while Linux is a pile of improvised hacks roughly following an "ancient" 1970s design.
Of course that might be wrong, and I'm using Linux almost continuously on last year and it seems solid, the only annoyances being installing stuff, and things designed with 1970s mentality that forces the use of the terminal.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

Try OpenSUSE it has Yast2 GUI GTK. Graphical manager for packages, one-click install of downloaded RPMs from web sources. Full GUI for all system settings, services, etc. No CLI needed.