this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
731 points (98.3% liked)

Political Memes

5479 readers
3589 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The pandemic "HEROES" act (extreme fucking irony) in 2022 brought all defaulted student loans to "current." And because they're Federal loans, the government can still attempt to collect. And they tack on 20+ years' interest. So for a 3k Perkins loan from 2001, they want an additional $2,750 in interest. And if you MADE PAYMENTS in the past, quelle surprise, they have no record of that.

And instead of being able to talk to the actual Dept of Education, they've placed collection agencies like ECSI as their front of house. ECSI will say, only the school can dismiss these charges. So you contact your school, the school expresses incredulity, reaches out to ECSI to tell them the debt has been written off, and then ECSI (aka DoEd) says, nuh-uh.

It's a system designed to resolve nothing while putting people over a cheese grater from loans they didn't even need from 2 decades ago.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This?

@WrenFeathers@lemmy.world

IDK why there aren’t articles complaining about it

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Nothing in that seems to illustrate by example anything the other person is claiming by their anecdotal experience with the matter.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago

I didn’t do a deep enough dive but nothing immediately jumped out at me either

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago
[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That’s not proof. That’s just further explaining what you said. I’d like to see actual evidence of what you’re suggesting.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee -3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Well fucking look it up yourself. If you haven't clued in, I'm describing my own experience. You think I'm posting the ECSI letter and correspondence from my undergrad in the early 2000s here for you?

[–] droporain@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 day ago

Remember bro your not the fuck face whisperer, you don't have to explain things.

[–] Sciaphobia@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

That wouldn't be a particularly good proof even if you did. That would just demonstrate something happened once. A sample size of one is, in most cases, not really all that useful. I would say all, but I'm not completely sure there are no exceptions.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Then don’t say things you can’t or won’t back up with anything outside of anecdotal experience.