Television

4610 readers

117 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

NewsAutoMod@lemmy.world

automodbeta@lemmy.world

Apple TV+ spent $20B on original content. If only people actually watched. (arstechnica.com)

submitted 2 days ago by GreenEngineering3475@lemmy.world to c/television@lemmy.world

59 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/22226160

Reportedly high budget has brought Apple TV+ a lot of prestige, but not a lot of viewers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They're not available here, and can I even watch on Google TV? Sailing the high seas seems to be the best. Not my problem if I need an apple tv to watch apple tv +

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago

Not my problem if I need an apple tv to watch apple tv +

You do not need an AppleTV to watch. The app is available on quite a few popular platforms, including many SmartTVs, Roku, Fire Sticks, PS4, PS5, several Xbox models, and Android TV.

[–] allan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

On android TV there's an app. Amazon's Appstore as well for their fire TV sticks. But yeah

[–] SquatDingloid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah everything should be on one service otherwise it's just easier to browse torrent sites that have everything on one service