this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
887 points (98.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

5823 readers
2269 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 71 points 2 days ago (3 children)

CEOs are hired by owners/investors for the explicit purpose of maximizing profits. If the CEO were instead, for instance, elected by the workers, or hired by a community cooperative, I think opinions of CEOs would be much higher.

In other words: it's not the CEO, it's the system.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If a CEO was elected by thr employees it would be like any other elected official, where it can swing widely from being excellent to awful because large numbers of people are not great at selecting quality leadership. Now a system where an employee elected board selects the CEO and the employees have the power to remove the CEO, that could be pretty solid.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The problem seems to be getting large numbers of people to agree on things. My solution is to simply not have large numbers of people.

[–] Sorse@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The problem seems to be getting large numbers of people to agree on things. My solution is to simply not have ~~large numbers of~~ people.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Now you're getting it

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This but unironically

People are too short sighted and plainly put, fucking stupid, to govern themselves. That’s why democracy is kind of an inherently unstable system until one group manages to consolidate enough power to ignore the others

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Deciding on a restaurant with a few people is easy. Deciding on a restaurant with a few dozen people is fucking impossible.

Humans were not meant to live in societies of more than 150 people. Our brains can't comprehend a nation of millions, just like we can't comprehend the vastness of space.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Democracy is bad but still the least worst system. The thing that people seem to ignore the most is that checks and balances are what make it great. A voting public is important but not the only important check on the system.

The juiciest part of market socialism is that when all the employees get a direct share of the business' profits, they are spontaneously incentivized to work efficiently and minimize waste.

It's a win-win.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I can hate both.

The CEO just lets me add a face to the ire.