this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
418 points (97.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

9662 readers
94 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/33126960

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rah@feddit.uk 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

You can't be fucking bothered to wait a few seconds. That's literally a complaint about convenience.

Blocking a cyclepath impacts the safety of cyclists. And yet:

no matter how many times you hear the consequences you put on the health and safety of other people, your fucking spoiled entitlement and positioning your humanity over others causes you to interpret it as "convenience."

You're projecting.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Blocking a cycle path impacts the safety of cyclists if they're too stupid and impatient to wait a few seconds.

Why would you quote a point and then not just fail to refute it, but reply with something that point refutes? Are you stupid?

You’re projecting.

Belligerent stupid child. You've had it spelled out for you but you can't hear anything that doesn't flatter your selfishness. You're whining about an inconvenience of a few seconds and you feel entitled to my physical well being. The risk you claim only exists if you're a fucking moron that swerves into traffic instead of a) looking, or b) waiting. The risk to my body is not a risk; it's a consequence of the extra stress on my body that costs you nothing and is therefore of no consequence.

The good news, you piece of shit sociopath? You don't get a fucking say. I'm going to take care to keep myself safe and healthy no matter how much of a spoiled tantrum you throw about it.

Seethe, you fucking lowlife.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Blocking a cycle path impacts the safety of cyclists if they're too stupid and impatient to wait a few seconds.

Not blocking a cycle path impacts the safety of Amazon drivers if they're too stupid and impatient to walk a few seconds.

you piece of shit sociopath

U seem angry bro.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"I'm right because you expressed emotions when I bloodlessly denied your humanity"

-a piece of shit sociopath exhibiting the textbook traits

[–] rah@feddit.uk 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 days ago

Guess you're dumb