this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
5 points (72.7% liked)

Futurology

1776 readers
182 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
voidx@futurology.today
Lugh@futurology.today
Espiritdescali@futurology.today
AwesomeLowlander@futurology.today
5
he AI lab waging a guerrilla war over exploitative AI: The tools Glaze and Nightshade are giving artists hope that they can fight back against AI that hoovers internet data to train. Are they enough? (www.technologyreview.com)
submitted 6 hours ago by BaylorSwift3@futurology.today to c/futurology@futurology.today
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Navigator@jlai.lu 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)
  • Yes they are afraid to not being able to live, but is the incentive to sell your art or die make them happy ? I doubt it.
  • I'm not for abolishing intellectual property. In fine artist who don't want to be share shouldn't, but the fact is most artist aren't ready to defend their art in court to get their will respected. They prefer to wait for the magical technological miracle that will save them, exactly like the rest of us.
  • Rarity is still a topic here, because in itself selling art online doesn't bound the file sell to the usage of the person who bought it. AI doesn't prevent artists to sell their art, but it feels like it didn't it ? Why ? Because the art is even more largely accessible to commoners and we don't want that because it is lowering the value of art. But it's just the financial value of the piece that gets to go down, not the real interesting value.