this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
498 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19107 readers
2910 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 28 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Harris turnout was lower than Biden. Trump's was just barely up, but pretty much the same as last time. That means something with Harris failed. That's the thing that changed.

[–] sozesoze@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Harris had the slight problem of 4 years of being VP to Biden where people aren't better off and then saying she is basically doing the same as Biden.

And people are misogynist and racist.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world -3 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Couldn’t be misogyny and racism. Has to be “she didn’t get her message out”.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Everyone looking for "the" answer needs to realize it was a ton of stuff. Lack of a primary, failing to separate from Biden, campaigning with Republicans, failure to take a hard stance on genocide, ignorant/ill-informed voters, propaganga, misogyny, and racism are only some of the reasons.

Misogyny and racism are the roadblocks to get through, and constantly influences what the public perceives she can/can't do. Versus trump who could "shoot someone on 5th ave"

You're not wrong or anything, all the stuff matters, it just hurts her more than average white male politician when the stuff she can control isn't executed perfectly. They should have prepared for this rhetorical of biden not running and had a plan in place, it was such a scramble.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 9 points 6 days ago

It certainly didn't help, but no I'm pretty confident that isn't the factor that changed.

Anyway, agreeing with that creates an issue. The democrats can only control what they do. Blaming it on voters just not liking women or PoC means the only solution is to only run white men. I don't agree with that. There's things that went wrong that democrats can control that aren't just that. Primarily, appealing to the working class. Yeah, democrats are better for them but their message wasn't appealing to them while Trump's was.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Sorry buddy, but you're wrong. You wish it was that easy to handwave away the democrats failures. We can't afford to let the blue conservatives run in circles in that tiny box they think in any longer.

The democrats need to give us that change Obama promised us. They need to give 3rd parties equal access to the electoral system by getting rid of First Past The Post voting in states they control.

It's over... they had their chance. Pass electoral reform and get the fuck out of the way.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Could be that "I'll preserve the current untenable status quo" was a shit message.