this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
19 points (95.2% liked)

Wikipedia

1530 readers
266 users here now

A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.

Rules:

Recommended:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (9 children)

Inexplicably unpopular opinion: the priority for Wikipedia is not to delete whole articles, it's to delete unsubstantiated content within articles.

Personally I would be in favor of a bot that, after expiry of a time limit, deletes everything in an article - everything - where no citation has been provided. The resulting encyclopedia would be smaller but more accurate by definition, and almost certainly more useful.

I just cannot understand why it's so widely considered acceptable that articles contain unsourced factoids for years, even decades, on end.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I think there’s an as big problem in that the citation provided often does not back the sentence claim’s, but since people rarely check the sources it gets included.

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is a big problem in actual research too

[–] dharmacurious 2 points 3 days ago

As a college student, I have certainly never cited a completely irrelevant source with a similar-enough sounding title at 11:55pm for a paper due at midnight to get my source count up to meet a rubric... I would never. I resent the accusation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)