this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
418 points (97.5% liked)

Flippanarchy

130 readers
75 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 

ID: a photo of a child scratching their head looking confused and maybe anxious, the text above says: "Damn... I'm kinda tired of living inside a giant pyramid scheme controlled by criminals who gaslight us into believing they are the good guys."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] freewheel@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yes, that should be obvious to even the most casual observer. In practice however it doesn't matter. There will always be layers to any bureaucracy. The need is to start peeling back the layers.

For the record, this sort of rhetoric does not help. All you're achieving (perhaps your goal) is to push people away from the fight.

[โ€“] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago

It would be hard to say confidently that any given rhetoric hasn't been captured by some purpose opposed to its overt intent. Words are more like Go than Checkers, and that's part of the difficulty here. There's a recursive pattern to this discussion: expressing a sentiment that the former statement has or may have been captured by malign intent. The urge to repeat that pattern is I would guess why there is writing here rather than none, and that isn't bad even if it doesn't exactly get anyone any closer to seeing the real big picture.