this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
206 points (98.1% liked)

World News

39019 readers
2611 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

U.K. defense chief Admiral Sir Tony Radakin reported that Russia suffered its highest casualty rate since the start of the Ukraine war, with 1,500 Russian soldiers killed or wounded daily in October, totaling around 700,000 casualties since February 2022.

Radakin noted that these losses are for minor territorial gains, and emphasized the heavy strain of Russia’s defense spending.

While allies of U.S. President-elect Donald Trump suggest Ukraine may need to cede territory to achieve peace, Radakin affirmed Western support for Ukraine “as long as it takes.” Trump, who aims to end U.S. support for Ukraine, has not outlined a specific peace strategy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

And none of that necessarily translates to a sufficient will to help Ukraine. Germany has already been making it clear they want to scale down support

[–] nexusband@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Where has Germany said that? If we are going to have elections in January, it's highly likely Merz will be chancellor and while I do not agree with the CDU on social and economic issues, rest assured, Ukraine will have Taurus by the end of March and the full permission to use it as they see fit for the war effort.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't think that we should take anything Merz said in the opposition as a reliable indication of his policies if he runs the next government. He has a loooooong track record of lies. In particular he lied about clear opposition to the pro Russian fascist AfD, which his party is working with more and more on local and state level.

[–] nexusband@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

which his party is working with more and more on local and state level.

Please proof that statement. The CDU in Saxony spoke with the AfD, but that's it.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] nexusband@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Danke, der kommunalwiki Link bzw die Übersicht ist besonders interessant...wusste ich nicht, I stand corrected!

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I just remember news about Germany planning to halve military aid to Ukraine from the summer, but honestly I haven't been keeping up with the situation

[–] nexusband@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

After 50 Billion in various loans for Ukraine that are shouldered in a big part by Germany...4 Million less per year are "pointless" in lieu of Ukraine getting direct and local production of ammunition and missiles...

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It seems to me like most European countries see supplying equipment to destroy the Russian army in Ukraine as preferable to destroying the Russian army on their own soil. Although I do hope Germany picks up the pace rather than reduces it.

However, even without Germany, there are plenty of other European countries that will be capable of buying truckloads of equipment from German manufacturers.

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

But considering that Ukraine has been facing consistent shortages of materiel – including things like various kinds of artillery ammunition (although part of the problem especially with shells is that production is still ramping up) – that really doesn't seem to have been the case. A lot of the equipment they've been given has just been token amounts that are clearly not enough but makes it seem like at least we're doing something.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

I definitely think the ramping up is going far too slowly, and as such it isn't strange that there are shortages.

This is a huge war- the largest land war since WWII. All of NATO is still operating on a peace-time economy, so ramping up production to the levels required to support a 500 k - 1 mill. strong army like the Ukrainians is taking far too long.

However, as far as I can tell, production in Europe is only heading one way: Up. Not only that, Russia is operating in a war economy, which is, more or less by definition, unsustainable in the long run. Europe has the economic capacity to double its production, and maintain it indefinitely. I just think we should prioritise more heavily, and scale up more quickly.