this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
457 points (77.4% liked)

Memes

45746 readers
1694 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
457
quick reminder (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by hairinmybellybutt@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SwampYankee@mander.xyz 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Common ownership" as in the workers collectively own the means of production. You, individually, don't get to own it, but a union of workers, a local collective, or the state might own it and decisions would be made, ostensibly, by the workers who make up those entities.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

or the state might own it

In other words... the workers don't own squat.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

There would generally be mandatory meetings for workers to attend that would allow for debates on the trajectory of the company. The state would "own" it but the workers would still direct it.

In a very very small way, it is like what Germany does with large corporations. They require a percentage of the board of directors be actual workers so it's not just a bunch of capitalist parasites making decisions that would hurt workers just to boost their own portfolios/profits.

[–] SwampYankee@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Depends to what extent the state can be said to truly represent the workers.