this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
16 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

663 readers
146 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Agreed, all fines should be on profit and not revenue. Revenue is a terrible metric to enact fines.

[โ€“] golli@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That I am actually not sure about, since you can manipulate profit numbers much easier (see Hollywood accounting) compared to revenue. But making money is ultimately of course the goal for profit companies, so naturally where you can hurt them.

If you decide to not go for a draconian fine where the margin of error are wider (doesn't matter too much if you fine 4 or 5 times profit, you still get the point across), then you need to at least try to put in some effort to be accurate.

And 3% margin on a deal would be something you'd see from discount retailers like Aldi or Walmart.