this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
-7 points (34.8% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

296 readers
55 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.

Rules

Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Seem like not endorsing the government or the blue party will get you banned for trolling at climate@slrpnk.net

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No, you're intentionally ignorant.

If both are unsuitable for the climate cause, it doesn't mean you get a 3rd option. It means the climate is irrelevant for this election. In that case you lost the chance to have a climate relevant option many years ago. Voting a 3rd party or not voting will not pressure the candidates to do anything for the climate now. Even the threat of letting the authoritarian fascist win comes too late, because third parties are already out.

Also, if the US doesn't elect the democrat candidate now, trump will be elected and there will be no way of doing anything for the climate with the US any more, likely forever.

The ship has sailed. You can only choose how bad you lose now.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 7 points 1 week ago

Relax. I am agreeing with you, or was aiming to.

The whole US political system is unsuitable for dealing with climate change, but the Democrats are at least trying to some extent to push it in the right direction. Letting Trump get elected would be a massive catastrophe. That's what I, and Greta Thunberg, and you, are saying, I think.

Coming out with "you're intentionally ignorant" isn't generally a good way to start the conversation, even if you don't agree with the person.

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

voting a 3rd party or not voting will not pressure the candidates to do anything for the climate now.

Wrong, by losing votes the red and blue party are forced to change their policies to get votes back otherwise they lose elections. On the contrary if they don't lose any support they are not really forced or motivated to do any change.

Also, if the US doesn’t elect the democrat candidate now, trump will be elected and there will be no way of doing anything for the climate with the US any more, likely forever.

Read what Greta Thunberg said

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago

Wrong, by losing votes the red and blue party are forced to change their policies to get votes back otherwise they lose elections. On the contrary if they don’t lose any support they are not really forced or motivated to do any change.

And the red or blue party still have a majority even though some votes go to third parties. I don't see how that make them lose elections?

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

dood, the election contest is over now. you're chasing ghosts of the past

[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Really? Who's the president elect?

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

No dood, the contest, not the election itself smh