this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
384 points (98.5% liked)

196

16423 readers
1944 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] superkret@feddit.org 44 points 5 days ago (9 children)

Just divide the number into its prime factors and then check if one of them is 2.

[–] fartripper@lemmy.ml 20 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

or divide the number by two and if the remainder is greater than

-(4^34)

but less than

70 - (((23*3*4)/2)/2)

then

true
[–] superkret@feddit.org 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What if the remainder is greater than the first, but not less than the latter?

Like, for example, 1?

[–] prime_number_314159@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Then you should return false, unless the remainder is also greater than or equal to the twenty second root of 4194304. Note, that I've only checked up to 4194304 to make sure this works, so if you need bigger numbers, you'll have to validate on your own.

[–] fartripper@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

i hate to bring this up, but we also need a separate function for negative numbers

You can just bitwise AND those with ...000000001 (for however many bits are in your number). If the result is 0, then the number is even, and if it's 1, then the number is odd. This works for negative numbers because it discards the negative signing bit.

load more comments (7 replies)