United States | News & Politics

1922 readers

914 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

simsymbiote@midwest.social

Type1@midwest.social

636

How Trump or Harris tax plans might change your income (slrpnk.net)

submitted 2 weeks ago by ByteOnBikes to c/usa@midwest.social

121 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Source https://www.barrons.com/articles/trump-harris-tax-rates-plans-cuts-income-e8db90ee

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] natecox@programming.dev 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Are you perhaps color blind? The shades of red and green were pretty clear for me at a glance.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Sure, but is people making over $14m/year paying more taxes really a bad thing?

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

For them it is...

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I’m sure the post tax income will still be enough to soak up the tears.

Fuck em.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I think they might be. blue would've been a better choice. it's weird that people still use red and green when it's the best known and most common form of color blindness and it affects as much as 1 in 20 people, give or take. that's not a small percentage. color blindness in general affects 1 in 12 people.

[–] el_abuelo@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

1 in 12 men I believe. It's not as common in women.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

that's for red-green, which is why I said about 1 in 20 -- maybe closer to 1 in 25 -- but in total, all color vision deficiency types add up to around 1 in 12 people.

[–] el_abuelo@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No it isn't. 1 in 12 men are colour blind. Only 1 in 200 women are colour blind.

https://enchroma.com/pages/facts-about-color-blindness

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

colorblindawareness.org seems to say it both ways

There is general agreement that worldwide 8% of men and 0.5% of women have a red/green type of colour vision deficiency.

[...]

The 8% of colour blind men with inherited colour blindness can be divided approximately into 1% deuteranopes, 1% protanopes, 1% protanomalous and 5% deuteranomalous

the thing here is even 8% is the total number of CVD men, that's inherited. there's also CVD that comes with age:

... as many as 3% of the population could be affected because age-related deficiency is relatively common in the over 65s and therefore on the increase in the UK due to the rising numbers of elderly people per capita

so that's more people. added to the 4.25% that would make 7.25% -- somewhere between 1 in 13 to 14 people. doesn't matter too much, it is significant and should be considered in design.