this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
234 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19118 readers
3667 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Half of Gen Z voters — and 1 in 4 U.S. voters overall — have lied to people close to them about who they're voting for, according to the latest Axios Vibes survey by The Harris Poll.

The findings raise big questions about the limits and future of polling, which relies on voters giving responses reflecting their real-life political behavior.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If a pollster somehow gets through to me, they are not get a reasonable or PC answer. I'm telling them all sorts of terrible things I think about their uninvited solicitation of me, and where they can shove. If I wasn't a petulant child that responds to cunts that way, I still wouldn't give them anything. I won't put a sign outside my house, because Republicans are fucking crazy and self proclaimed "domestic terrorists", and staying off any of their lists is certainly a forethought.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Or, you know, instead of getting all worked up and raging unnecessarily, you could just hang up.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Nope. Spam should cost the spammer in time wasted. Alone, it's a small thing; but it scales really well.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

If you want to waste your own time and be angry, you do you. Sometimes I'll string them along if I'm in the mood, but I'm not all angry doing it, I'm enjoying it.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No. I want the people that interfere with my me time to know how worthless I think they are. They didn't get that if I hang up.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Go on you for making some poor worker bee just trying to make a buck feel worthless. Very noble goal that will certainly change things.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not hard. Stay the fuck out of my personal space and time, and I won't lambast you for invading my personal space and time. Nobody made a pollster call me, or a religious nut solicit me at my residence. If I'm in a public place and someone approaches me, I say no thanks and move on, but that curtousy ends when at personal space.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s not hard.

It's also not hard to not get all angry and be an asshole to someone just trying to make a buck. It's also pointless because this poor person on the other end of the phone is not really in charge of whether or not it happens, they are just getting paid. So being an asshole to them just makes you an asshole, not some noble warrior. If you're happy with being an asshole for no good reason, more power to you, I guess.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I gave you plenty of good reasons for being an asshole. Idgaf if that person's only job prospect was a pollster, because the position as it exists is inherently intrusive and should be legal. I have absolutely zero remorse for being an asshole to the asshole that's bugging me. Maybe if I'm shitty enough, they'll report me and they'll put me on a do not call list.

If you want to cater to them, more power to you, but I'm not here to care about the feelings of the asshole that's bugging me.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I gave you plenty of good reasons for being an asshole.

You gave plenty of good reasons why their actions make you upset and offend you. This is not the same as them being good reasons to be an asshole. If someone offends you and you are pointlessly an asshole to them as a result, that just makes you an asshole too.

Maybe if I’m shitty enough, they’ll report me and they’ll put me on a do not call list.

Another poster here pointed out, from their personal experience do this type of work, that they don't really care. They just hang up and move to the next person. By getting angry and being an asshole to them is almost certainly pointless and will not have this result. Almost certainly, if your goal is to get removed from these lists, you would be better served to ask them kindly to be put on some do-not-call list. I know it has worked for me.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Here's the deal, I truly don't give a fuck about these people that call me. If they stick around long enough to hear me, that's on them. If they cry because of what I say, I don't care. I really truly believe that uninvited solicitation is one of the scummiest things that's considered acceptable, and everyone that's a participant can fuck off. I'm an unrepentant asshole because I fucking hate them. There's your reason.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I’m an unrepentant asshole because I fucking hate them.

This is pretty much what I've been saying the whole time. You do you, but don't act like its anything other than just being an asshole.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I never claimed otherwise. I just explained why I hate them.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I've worked call centers and I assure you no one gives a fuck about a bad reaction as soon as it's over. I'd imagine it's a similar dynamic for phonebankers.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 4 points 3 weeks ago

Okay, so change it to "good on your for trying to make some poor worker bee feel worthless"

It only makes it worse, because it's both assholish and ineffective.