this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
74 points (98.7% liked)

Ukraine

8240 readers
423 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Despite efforts to bring these shipments to market, none have yet been sold. They are currently stored in floating storage facilities near Murmansk and Kamchatka.

How are the ships keeping the LNG in liquid state? Its cryogenic gas which means keeping it cold to keep it in liquid form. Are they simply offgassing the boil off, or are there re-freezers build into the ships to cool the boil off back to liquid?

[–] supercriticalcheese@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Thermodynamics, heat in causes boil off but that takes massive energy to vaporise everything, and it is limited thanks to the good insulation.

Boil off is never vented, it powers the engines. They can also reliquify for some ships at least.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Decent LNG tanks seems to have a boil off of about 0.05% of max volume per day. So after some 3 years (1000 days), your tank would be half empty. But I'd wager the rates are a lot higher in ships, since they have some weight and space restrictions you don't get on land.

Use some to power the engines, put the rest through a recondenser? There's probably a financial optimum there somewhere.

[–] supercriticalcheese@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes but they can get quite close to that. And voyages don't last that long.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's a fair point. Imagine the cost just having a whole ass ship shitting there, doing literally nothing.

[–] supercriticalcheese@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

That would be wasting money, ships are expensive to charter.

Whoever operates them have every interest to have them moving about.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)