this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
1197 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19088 readers
3869 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Been saying it for weeks. Nobody with half a brain would fall for that shit.

A vote against Harris is a vote against protecting America. That may not be true next election(fuck, I hope it's not), but right here...right now....it's true.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It will absolutely true next election. Democrats will keep undermining progressives and running weak and ineffective candidates until the dice fall badly and the fascists win. That's how these cycles always go.

Every election will be more dangerous than the one before until elections stop. The next Trump will be far more capable than the rapist toddler we're dealing with now.

[–] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 weeks ago

yeah, we all know that. "the next trump" has been waiting in the wings since that guy got stabbed in ancient Rome. democracy requires all of us to complain and demonstrate.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world -3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nobody with half a brain would fall for that

it's a lot of good people on the far left side of twitter

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world -4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Where we need to take America doesn't need extremists, of any kind.

I don't have a problem when Americans dislike abortions. I do have a problem when they try to take the option away from Americans.

I don't have a problem with people protesting civil rights violations. I do have a problem with Americans rioting and killing each other.

Extremism of any kind is toxic and has no place in a stable future. That's because all extremism is born out of a strong emotional desire or need from the people.

IMO the only way out of this is to stomp out the conservative extremist fires and roll back the damage they've done. Only this will appease the extreme left enough for them to walk back from the line.

Progress forward is a balancing act that requires a soft touch. Unfortunately we had four years of a crude daft orange ogre that destroyed that balance.

As long as we make it through the next two months, we should be fine. Extremists can't do anything against a mind they can't manipulate. Just don't fall for the emotional trap.

Stay calm, stay vigilant, stay in control.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

You won't do anything, centrist, that's the point of being a centrist.

[–] hatedbad@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

“America in 2016 was perfect until orange man ruined it, we simply need to return to 2016 and everything will be ok”

  • the politics understander
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

American politics in 2016 wasn't perfect, that's why it's been called the "Great American Experiment".

But the world was a whole lot quieter in 2015. Wasn't it?

Americans got along a lot better than they do today in 2015. Didn't they?

My point was that we need to go back to that if we have any hope of moving forward.

Unfortunately, the Russian and Chinese governments have been trying to drive a wedge between the American public, and they're succeeding. Their actions have fractured American conservative parties into useless, "do-nothings". Now they're trying to do the same thing to the left. Until now they've been unsuccessful.

The United States of America has peered into the abyss before, similar to how we are now. I'll quote something that someone very wise said at that time that still rings true today.

A house divided against itself, cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved – I do not expect the house to fall – but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other.

As we stand upon the precipice, with baited breath, I hope for a future that my children can inherit.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

My point was that we need to go back to that if we have any hope of moving forward.

So, Make America Great Again

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

America is just Exceptional that way

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

Thanks for reminding me to read this book:

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This was reported, I'm not sure its rule breaking, but its weirdly aggressive.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] LotrOrc@lemmy.world -4 points 2 weeks ago

I'm pretty sure this has been the scare tactic for the last 8 presidential elections of my lifetime

[–] index@sh.itjust.works -5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You don't need much of a brain to understand that voting and supporting criminals with blood on their hands is bad. You also don't need to be too smart to understand that your choice isn't limited to vote between two colors.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

You also don’t need to be too smart to understand that your choice isn’t limited to vote between two colors.

I mean.. you said it.

But I agree, only idiots believe that third parties are viable in our broken electoral saystem