this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
-9 points (26.3% liked)

Economy

433 readers
101 users here now

Lemmy Community for economy, business, politics, stocks, bonds, product releases, IPOs, advice, news, investment, videos, predictions, government, money, politics, debate, current trends and more.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The funny thing is how quickly "millionaire" has become a meaningless term.

iirc in the 1989 Batman movie Bruce Wayne is still described as a 'millionaire.' By 2004 he was a 'billionaire.'

At this point, anyone with a house could come up with $1 million.

[–] earlgrey0@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Also she’s from the Bay Area, every house starts at a million. So just owning a home in the area she lived and worked in would make her a millionaire by default. It’s such a bad metric.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

I think it was Isaac Asimov who wrote that we use 'astronomical' to describe vast amounts, but that eventually we'd replace 'astronomical' with 'financial'