this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
116 points (95.3% liked)

Selfhosted

39792 readers
471 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

hello,

im really tired of google music and spotify, and want to self host my downloaded music and create my library.

however, i know nothing about self hosting. My knowledge is absolutely zero. And Im completely lost about how to self host my own music. Dont find any good tutorial for dummies and i have a lot of question. I dont understand nothing. I see the tutorials of Navidrome and Ampache and still understand nothing. All of that looks extremely complicated to me.

How can i self host my music? I need to pay something? A very old and slow pc is enough?

Im completely lost. If someone can suggest something - like a tutorial , dunno - to build/self host my own music I appreciate a lot.

ty

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Quail4789@lemmy.ml 5 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

I've always wondered that. Why use linux server's images over official ones? Are they somehow better?

[–] Nurgus@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

When I first used Jellyfin, the official Docker image didn't have AMD video acceleration working out of the box and the LinuxServer one did.

LinuxServer images often solve problems and work out of the box better than the official option.

I think I'm right in saying they have a standardised and reliable option for running as a none-root user too.

[–] nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 hours ago

They're relatively easy to deploy.

[–] Lem453@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

For normal docker self hosters the biggest is similar structures across their images.

It config is always /config

Also they run the same user so it helps with file permission issues

https://www.linuxserver.io/