this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
91 points (93.3% liked)

politics

19127 readers
5394 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Among these voters, Harris gets a boost because they believe she would protect abortion rights, and some have broader hopes that electing the first female president could send a strong message to the country. But she’s weighed down by a number of important factors: a dim diagnosis of America’s economy, negative views about life during President Joe Biden’s administration and a lack of familiarity with her, which has bred ambivalence and distrust.

It’s different for Trump, one of the best-known political figures on the planet. Some of these voters believe his conduct during his time in office has disqualified him in their eyes, and even some of his supporters fear he’d focus more in a second term on fighting his enemies than on governing.

Still, a majority of the 12 participants in two sessions — part of the NBC News Deciders Focus Group, produced in collaboration with Syracuse University and the research firms Engagious and Sago — are leaning toward Trump for the oldest reason in politics: It’s the economy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 5 points 4 days ago (5 children)

But she’s weighed down by a number of important factors: a dim diagnosis of America’s economy, negative views about life during President Joe Biden’s administration and a lack of familiarity with her, which has bred ambivalence and distrust.

No mention of Gaza? Seriously?

[–] xenoclast@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Gaza is going to look like a joke compared to what happens to the world when Trump gets elected.

I guarantee you with 100% certainty within 6 months of Trump being elected you will not give any fucks about Gaza. Not. A. Single. Fuck.

Within a couple years people around you won't even remember Gaza was a "thing".

If America doesn't vote for Harris that's what will happen.

I will eat forty pounds of pig shit live on whatever autocraticly approved media platform is in control of your mind in 6 months after Trump is elected if I'm wrong.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I guarantee you with 100% certainty within 6 months of Trump being elected you will not give any fucks about Gaza.

If Trump wins there won't be a Gaza to worry about. Bibi will turn it into a glass parking lot.

Don't it always seem to go

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 days ago

!remindme 6 months

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io -2 points 3 days ago

Okay telling me, an Arab, that I won't care about Gaza in six months is... interesting, but do your thing I guess. That aside, has anyone told you that this attitude is condescending as fuck?

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

These are very low information voters.

There's a big bubble here with the number of people outraged about Gaza vs the average American giving no fucks.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The average American does, in fact, give at least a few fucks about Gaza and the prospect of another war in the Middle East. You can look up the polls yourself. Also, even if the average American didn't care, the average swing state American sure as hell does. Michigan gets the most popularity, but the American Midwest in general has a high number of Muslims who are a key demographic in this election. And, you know, people generally don't like genocide.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 5 points 4 days ago

A poll that prompts for a response for what someone thinks about a particular topic is not the same as figuring out whether the respondent regularly thinks about that topic when not being polled.

[–] ashok36@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Undecided voters don't give a shit about Gaza. They couldn't even tell you what continent Gaza is on.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They think Gaza is the place with the pyramids

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

Well if it's not then why are they fighting over it?

/s

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world -4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You're literally saying that Palestinian and Muslim voters have no idea where Gaza is?

[–] ashok36@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Undecided voters.

Can you read?

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Gaza isn’t much of a topic outside of lemmy, far left, and some young people.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And among American Muslims. I count two absolutely necessary demographics if Harris wants to win in November here.

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I don’t think those people will be the tipping point. Any of them who think “Harris won’t help” certainly cannot think that trump will. perhaps they won’t vote at all. I suppose not voting is a strategy that has proven itself to work, time and time again. Leaving the decision to fate, I guess. Knowing that the absence of their vote will truly change things. Take that, Harris.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Take that, Harris.

Literally yes. Democrat turnout has been the deciding factor in elections for decades now. When democrat voters stay home, Democrats lose the election.

[–] ravhall@discuss.online -1 points 3 days ago

I’m sure the electoral college has already made up their mind.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml -4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

it's a puff piece meant to cast nonvoters in a pejorative light; adding in gaza would be too on-the-nose.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Nonvoters should be cast in a pejorative light. People should be ashamed not to vote. If you don't care enough to decide the difference between two incredibly opposite futures for the country we should collectively dump your ass in the dead center of the Atlantic Ocean. Both sides are the same, right?

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

A significant portion of them can't vote because of voter suppression and the dnc is not bothering to help.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I agree, you're right. When I see nonvoter I assume moron instead of disenfranchised. There are far more of the former than the latter.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 1 points 3 days ago

Don't let that commenter gaslight you. They weren't referencing disenfranchised voters - those who can't vote - when they wrote "Gaza would be too on-the-nose."